The history of political and social concepts richter melvin. History of Political and Social Concepts : A Critical Introduction. 2019-02-09

The history of political and social concepts richter melvin Rating: 7,8/10 479 reviews

Download [PDF] The History Of Political And Social Concepts Free Online

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

In Germany, there is ' Begriffsgeschichte', a 'history of concepts' on the border between the history of language and the history of society. New York: Oxford Journal Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences — Wiley Published: Jun 1, 1998. Applied to France as well as Germany, their work has set new standards for the historical study of political and social language, Begriffsgeschichte. The questions these scholars address, and the methods they apply systematically to a broad range of sources, differ as much from the styles of Hegel, Dilthey, and Meinecke as from those of A. Fuller Torrey, a successful and effective popularizer of psychiatry, and specifically biological psychiatry, reviews the forces and policies that have caused the American disaster of deinstitutionalization of mental patients.

Next

The history of political and social concepts : a critical introduction / Melvin Richter

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

Moreover it argues that there has been an inherent politicisation of the concept of national interests, such that strategic culture and foreign policy cannot be understood other than in terms of a historically distorted political debate. Richter surveys the three major works that historians of concepts have produced: Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialer Sprache in Deutschland, Historisches Wor¨ terbuch der Philosophie, and Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich, 1680 – 1820. After assessing the programs and achievements of Begriffsgeschichte, the author argues the need for an analogous project to chart the careers of political and social concepts used in English-speaking societies. What is it that we know when we learn the history of a concept? Richter's new book, The History of Political and Social Concepts, functions both as a general introduction to, and a critique of, conceptual history. After assessing the programs and achievements of Begriffsgeschichte, the author argues the need for an analogous project to chart the careers of political and social concepts used in English-speaking societies. His manner of reviewing its historiographical background should be welcomed by those unfamiliar with recent developments in the works of German historians.

Next

Profile

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

He then shows how Montesquieu inaugurated the modern rebirth of this tradition by laying the intellectual foundations for moderate government. Relying on an extraordinary array of witnesses and texts from politicians, philosophers, theologians, and poets to Renaissance paintings and the dreams of German citizens during the Third Reich, Koselleck shows that, with the advent of modernity, the past and the future became 'relocated' in relation to each other. This volume opens a discussion of what and how each of them can learn from, and contribute to, the others. How can we explain this striking paradox? Why do we often underestimate the virtue of moderation? For example, the creation of national projects has expanded from the Netherlands, which was a working project at the time that my book appeared, to a number of other settings which I would not have anticipated. Richter surveys the three major works that historians of concepts have produced: Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialer Sprache in Deutschland, Historisches Wor¨ terbuch der Philosophie, and Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich, 1680 – 1820. After assessing the programs and achievements of Begriffsgeschichte, the author argues the need for an analogous project to chart the careers of political and social concepts used in English-speaking societies. What is it that we know when we learn the history of a concept? Now, almost ten years after the publication of that work, how do you evaluate this reception? What is it that we know when we learnthe history of a concept? What difference does it make that we know it? Addressed not only to historians of political and social thought, this work will interest students and scholars of political culture, social historians, and historians of ideas, historiography, law, language, and rhetoric.

Next

Political Theory and Political Education

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

Although conceptual historians agree that the field of action is defined by language, they place concept formation and use within historical contexts. Anthony Grafton, Glenn Most, Salvatore Settis, Cambridge, Mass. Since its foundation in London in 1998, the reception has been more positive and over a far greater and more diverse area than I could have anticipated. What difference does it make that we know it? By surveying political and social discourses systematically, this genre traces how the great modern revolutions have been conceptualized in sharply contested forms by competing political and social formations, as well as by individual thinkers. What difference does it make that we know it? The major accomplishments of'Begriffsgeschichte' have not been narrative histories as such but lexicons.

Next

The History of Political and Social Concepts (豆瓣)

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

The questions these scholars address, and the methods they apply systematically to a broad range of sources, differ as much from the styles of Hegel, Dilthey, and Meinecke as from those of A. Applied to France as well as Germany, their work has set new standards for the historical study of political and social language, Begriffsgeschichte. Conceptual History and Translation: An Interview with Melvin Richter Conceptual History and Translation: An Interview with Melvin Richter Oieni; Vicente; Feres Jr. Religion and the Order of Nature. Melvin Richter was born in Revere, Mass. Richter provides not only an overview of its fundamental presuppositions and accomplishments, but also a critical analysis of its methods. Translation is indispensible to transmissions of knowledge across time and place; to understanding how and what others think.

Next

Profile

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

Craiutu looks at important figures such as Jacques Necker, Madame de Staël, and Benjamin Constant, not only in the context of revolutionary France but throughout Europe. In addition to The Politics of Conscience, his books include The Political Theory of Montesquieu, The History of Political and Social Concepts: a Critical Introduction translated into Chinese and Korean , as well as the edited volumes Essays in Theory and History, Political Writings of Montesquieu, Political Theory and Political Education, and those co-edited: The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. That said, the high level of scholarship in these fragments, as convincinglyportrayed by Richter, renders the value of such an approach beyond dispute. Now, almost ten years after the publication of that work, how do you evaluate this reception? A further distinguishing feature of these lexicons is that they were conceived in response to a specific research question: to investigate with precision the origins of modernity. He traces how moderation evolves from an individual moral virtue into a set of institutional arrangements calculated to protect individual liberty, and he explores the deep affinity between political moderation and constitutional complexity. Addressed not only to historians of political and social thought, this work will interest students and scholars of political culture, social historians, and historians of ideas, historiography, law, language, and rhetoric.

Next

The history of political and social concepts : a critical introduction

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

In the present context of globalization and its resulting crises, the modern world once again faces a crisis in aligning the experience of past and present. Out of the Shadows: Confronting America’s Mental Illness Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. Combining intellectual with social history, historians of concepts track linguistically the advent, mentalities, and effects of modernity. Only with the efforts of cultural mediators, like Richter, and with the appearance of excellent books like his, will German theoretical concerns have the opportunity to gain an audience in the Anglophone world and to stimulate the type of intellectualexchange that can enrich our collective knowledge of political and social concepts.

Next

The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction by Melvin Richter

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

Especially novel is the application of these issues to two relatively new disciplines: translation studies, and the history of concepts Begriffsgeschichte. No longer under Hegelian tutelage, in which ideas or spirit are deemed to have a priority over, and an autonomy from, the agents who purportedly are their vehicles, this new tendency in German historiography has sought to bring the study of language into a particularly close relationship with social and political history. Combining intellectual with social history, historians of concepts track linguistically the advent, mentalities, and effects of modernity. Although conceptual historians agree that the field of action is defined by language, they place concept formation and use within historical contexts. Lucidly written and judicious in its evaluations, this book will reach beyond German Studies, drawing the attention of non-German specialists to important theoretical developments in the FederalRepublic. Applied to France as well as Germany, their work has set new standards for the historical study of political and social language, Begriffsgeschichte. After transferring to the Government Department, he spent two years at Balliol College, Oxford, where he did the research for his Harvard Ph.

Next

The history of political and social concepts : a critical introduction

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

Thirteen contributors consider problems arising from the study of translation and cultural transfers of texts, in particular in terms of translation studies, and the history of concepts Begriffsgeschichte. Begriffsgeschichte treats political language neither as autonomous discourse, nor as the product of ideology, social structure, or elite manipulation. Craiutu demonstrates how moderation navigates between political extremes, and he challenges the common notion that moderation is an essentially conservative virtue, stressing instead its eclectic nature. History, Koselleck asserts, emerged in this crucial moment as a new temporality providing distinctly new ways of assimilating experience. This edited collection, written by a cross-disciplinary group of leading social policy researchers, analyses the concepts and language used to make sense of contemporary social policy.

Next

Melvin Richter

the history of political and social concepts richter melvin

Since the 1960s, German scholars have developed distinctive methods for writing the history of political, social, and philosophical concepts. By surveying political and social discourses systematically, this genre traces how the great modern revolutions have been conceptualized in sharply contested forms by competing political and social formations, as well as by individual thinkers. Richter's book is admirably perceptive, precise, balanced, lucid and concise. He concludes by calling for more collaboration between German historians who research Begriffsgeschichte and English-speaking intellectual historians. In other words, long-term developments and patterns in which the accumulated memory of what came earlier, can greatly and sometimes subconsciously influence subsequent policy choices. The questions these scholars address, and the methods they apply systematically to a broad range of sources, differ as much from the styles of Hegel, Dilthey, and Meinecke as from those of A.

Next